<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the most important source of authority in our society and why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vaezaarte.com/2010/01/what-is-the-most-important-source-of-authority-in-our-society-and-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vaezaarte.com/2010/01/what-is-the-most-important-source-of-authority-in-our-society-and-why/</link>
	<description>Eclectic Societal News And Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:39:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: radish</title>
		<link>http://www.vaezaarte.com/2010/01/what-is-the-most-important-source-of-authority-in-our-society-and-why/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>radish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vaezaarte.com/2010/01/what-is-the-most-important-source-of-authority-in-our-society-and-why/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizrave.com&quot;&gt;Marketing Strategies&lt;/a&gt;


1.   In the Weberian model of authority and power that you are using  we could trace both elements of charisma and legal authority in Obama&#039;s appoinment to the Presidency Then compare his particular combination  of  authority forms  with the status of other poltical leaders like Gordon Brown , Putin,etc. 

2. However in current Marxian models we could point too to 

a) the role of advertising agencies who cajole us to &#039;need to need&#039;

&#039;b) the global power of transnational corporate leaders.

c) the control of the heads of government bureaucracies especially those in the Treasury  who are dominated by the ideology of Economic Rationalism.  Then compare them with other heads of departments who prefer a more Keynesian approach to the economy.  nb there is a lot of mud slinging between these different authorities - each claiming to have the most &#039;rational&#039; interpretation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.bizrave.com">Marketing Strategies</a></p>
<p>1.   In the Weberian model of authority and power that you are using  we could trace both elements of charisma and legal authority in Obama&#8217;s appoinment to the Presidency Then compare his particular combination  of  authority forms  with the status of other poltical leaders like Gordon Brown , Putin,etc. </p>
<p>2. However in current Marxian models we could point too to </p>
<p>a) the role of advertising agencies who cajole us to &#8216;need to need&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;b) the global power of transnational corporate leaders.</p>
<p>c) the control of the heads of government bureaucracies especially those in the Treasury  who are dominated by the ideology of Economic Rationalism.  Then compare them with other heads of departments who prefer a more Keynesian approach to the economy.  nb there is a lot of mud slinging between these different authorities &#8211; each claiming to have the most &#8216;rational&#8217; interpretation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

